<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In which Lindsay attempts to teach herself Physics&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/in-which-lindsay-attempts-to-teach-herself-physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/in-which-lindsay-attempts-to-teach-herself-physics/</link>
	<description>Wanderers in the World of Sci-Fi Fandom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/in-which-lindsay-attempts-to-teach-herself-physics/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/?p=93#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Thanks to both of you for your responses! I also went over the issue with one of my professors, and I think I&#039;m beginning to have a little bit of a better grasp on light. (It&#039;s so interesting to think I could go for 20 years without fully grasping the concept!) Light is quite fascinating, add magnetism and it becomes even more exciting to try to puzzle out. 

And Bobbie -  I believe I understand how we evolved to see visible light. Our sun radiates mostly in the visible light, thus it is no coincidence that we see &quot;visible light&quot;. Perhaps if we were orbiting a star which radiated more Ultra Violet light, we would &quot;see&quot; in Ultra Violet. (In which case the sun would also be hotter and more massive...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to both of you for your responses! I also went over the issue with one of my professors, and I think I&#8217;m beginning to have a little bit of a better grasp on light. (It&#8217;s so interesting to think I could go for 20 years without fully grasping the concept!) Light is quite fascinating, add magnetism and it becomes even more exciting to try to puzzle out. </p>
<p>And Bobbie &#8211;  I believe I understand how we evolved to see visible light. Our sun radiates mostly in the visible light, thus it is no coincidence that we see &#8220;visible light&#8221;. Perhaps if we were orbiting a star which radiated more Ultra Violet light, we would &#8220;see&#8221; in Ultra Violet. (In which case the sun would also be hotter and more massive&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie (again)</title>
		<link>http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/in-which-lindsay-attempts-to-teach-herself-physics/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie (again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/?p=93#comment-87</guid>
		<description>One more thing,
It&#039;s no coincidence that we evolved to see &quot;visible light.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing,<br />
It&#8217;s no coincidence that we evolved to see &#8220;visible light.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gowithgravity</title>
		<link>http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/in-which-lindsay-attempts-to-teach-herself-physics/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>gowithgravity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/?p=93#comment-86</guid>
		<description>A couple thoughts:
Ultraviolet light is pretty readily scattered/absorbed by most stuff. Higher frequency light, like X-rays and higher, can more efficiently penetrate matter. 

You&#039;re at least partially on to something. Light that&#039;s fairly close in wavelength to visible light is in the part of the spectrum that interacts efficiently with the electronic structure of atoms, making scattering/absorption much more likely. 

Wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional, and have nothing to do with brightness/intensity. 

At the risk of being too pedantic, check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum - including the atmospheric opacity image on the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple thoughts:<br />
Ultraviolet light is pretty readily scattered/absorbed by most stuff. Higher frequency light, like X-rays and higher, can more efficiently penetrate matter. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re at least partially on to something. Light that&#8217;s fairly close in wavelength to visible light is in the part of the spectrum that interacts efficiently with the electronic structure of atoms, making scattering/absorption much more likely. </p>
<p>Wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional, and have nothing to do with brightness/intensity. </p>
<p>At the risk of being too pedantic, check out <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum</a> &#8211; including the atmospheric opacity image on the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie!!</title>
		<link>http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/in-which-lindsay-attempts-to-teach-herself-physics/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conventioneers.wordpress.com/?p=93#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Hi Lindsay :)
If you had a thin enough wall - say in a paper house - the sun would surely shine through.  Though you seem to understand what frequency is - it&#039;s the wavelength part maybe you struggle with.  If the light was brighter than sunlight it would in fact shine into a windowless room (hey maybe one day! - the sun is growing, right?)
The wavelength (not frequency) of radio waves are verrry large and think nothing of  a wall. Try to listen to the radio in a tunnel though, and you will find it impossible.

Hope any of this helps.
&lt;3Bobs the x-physicist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lindsay :)<br />
If you had a thin enough wall &#8211; say in a paper house &#8211; the sun would surely shine through.  Though you seem to understand what frequency is &#8211; it&#8217;s the wavelength part maybe you struggle with.  If the light was brighter than sunlight it would in fact shine into a windowless room (hey maybe one day! &#8211; the sun is growing, right?)<br />
The wavelength (not frequency) of radio waves are verrry large and think nothing of  a wall. Try to listen to the radio in a tunnel though, and you will find it impossible.</p>
<p>Hope any of this helps.<br />
&lt;3Bobs the x-physicist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
